TORUŃSKI ROCZNIK PODATKOWY

ISSN 2080-9573

trp header

Bogumił Brzeziński
The issue of causes and types of tax law complexity as shown by the literature

Summary

The increasing complexity of tax law is one of the main problems absorbing both the science and law practice. This applies to the content of its provisions and the form that gives them the legislators, too. The consequences of such a state of affairs are obvious and familiar: the uncertainty of the legal position of the taxpayer, arising disputes about the existence and scope of the tax liability as well as increased costs of the tax system. In contrast to the continental tax law literature which is not paying more attention to this important issue, a lot of in-depth analyzes of the problem can be found in Anglo-Saxon tax and tax law literature. The aim of this article is to show the most important topics of this discussion and to evaluate its results.

 

References

 

  1. Ault H., Tax Simplification from a Comparative Point of View [w:] International Studies in Taxation: Law and Economics. Liber Amicorum Leif Muntén,  G. Lindencrona (red.), S.-O. Lodin, B. Wiman, Kluwer Law International 1999.
  2. Avery-Jones , Tax Law: Rules or Principles? (17) Fiscal Studies 1996.
  3. Bittker B. “Income taxation entails a high level of irreducible complexity";Tax Reform and Tax Simplification, 29 University of Miami Law Review 1974.
  4. Boucher T., Affect the Equity and Efficiency of the Income Tax, National Tax Journal 1996.
  5. Brzeziński B., Complexity of Tax Law: The Anglosaxon Point of View, Comparative Law Review 2016.
  6. Brzeziński B., O idei uproszczenia prawa podatkowego, [w:] Ustrój, system finansowy państwa. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci profesor Natalii Gajl, Warszawa 1999 r.
  7. Brzeziński B., Uproszczenie podatków i prawa podatkowego, [w:] Prawo podatkowe. Teoria. Instytucje. Funkcjonowanie  B. Brzeziński (red.), TNOiK Dom Organizatora, Toruń 2009 r.
  8. Evans, i in., Taxation Compliance Costs: Some Recent Empirical Work and International Comparisons 14 Australian Tax Forum 1998.
  9. Chittenden F., Foster H., Sloan B., Taxation and Red Tape The Cost to British Business of Complying with the UK Tax System, London 2010.
  10. Ch. Evans, P. Lignier B. Tran-Nam, Personal taxpayer compliance costs: Recent evidence from Australia, 29  Australian Tax Forum 2014, nr 1.
  11. Cooper G., Themes and Issues in Tax Simplification, 10 Australian Tax Forum 1993.
  12. Doernberg R.L., The Market for Tax Reform; Public Pain For Private Gain, Tax Notes 1988.
  13. Evans C., i in.,A report into Taxpayer Costs of Compliance, Canberra 1997.
  14. Evans C., Studying the Studies: An overview of recent research into taxation operating costs,eJournal of Tax Research, 2003 r.
  15. Galper H., Kaufman M., Simplification and Comprehensive Tax Reform [w:] Federal Income Tax Simplification  C. Gustafson (red.), 1979, s.161 i nast.; Stepek M.J., Tax Reform Act of 1986: Simplification and the Future Viability of Accrual Taxation, 62 Notre Dame Law Review 1987.
  16. Gammie M., Tax Simplification: Right Path or Dead End? [w:] 1995 Conference Report (Canadian Tax Foundation, Toronto 1996).
  17. James S., Wallschutzky I., The Complexities of Tax Simplification: Progress in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom, 14 Australian Tax Forum 1998.
  18. Johnson S. R., Administrability-based Tax Simplification, Wiegand L., Lecture, 4 Nevada Law Journal, 2003-2004.
  19. Krever R., Taming Complexity in Australian Income Tax, 25 (4) Sydney Law Review 2003.
  20. Long S., Swingen J., The role of legal complexity in shaping taxpayer compliance, [w:] Van Koppen P., Hessing D., Van den Heuvel G., Lawyers on Psychology and Psychologists on Law, Amsterdam, after: Pau C., Sawyer A., Maples A., Complexity of New Zealand’s Tax Laws: An Empirical Study, 22 Australian Tax Forum 2007.
  21. McCaffery E., The Holy Grail of Tax Simplification, 1990 Wisconsin Law Review.
  22. McDaniel P., Federal Income Tax Simplification: The Political Process, 34 Tax Law Review 1978 r.
  23. McLure Charles, McLure Charles E., Jr, The Budget Process and Tax Simplification/Complication, 45 Tax Law Review 1989-1990.
  24. Milliron V., A Behavioural Study of the Meaning and Influence of Tax Complexity, 23(2) Journal of Accounting Research 1985.
  25. Moore S.M., A Proposal to Reduce the Complexity of Tax Regulations, Tax Notes 1987.
  26. Richardson I., The Concept of Income and Tax Policy, Canterbury Law Review,1990, vol. 4 nr 2.
  27. Richardson M., Sawyer A., Complexity in the Expression of New Zealand’s Tax Law: An Empirical Analysis, Australian Tax Forum 1998, vol. 14.
  28. Roberts S.I., Simplification Symposium Overview: The Viewpoint of the Tax Lawyer 34 Tax Law Review 1978, nr 5.
  29. Sandford C. T., i in., , Administrative and Compliance Costs of Taxation, Bath 1989.
  30. Sawyer A. J., Compliance Cost Impact Statements in New Zealand - How Far Have We Come? 17 Australian Tax Forum 2002, nr 4, s. 441-494; 13 Australian Tax Forum 1997.
  31. Slemrod J., Complexity, Compliance Costs and Tax Evasion [w:] Taxpayer Compliance,  Roth J.A. (red.), Scholz J.T.(red.) Philadelphia 1989.
  32. Smith D., Richardson G., The Readability of Australia’s Taxation Laws and Supplementary Materisls: An Empirical Investigations, Fiscal Studies 1999, vol. 20, nr 3.
  33. Strader J., Fogliasso C.E., An Investigation of Some Factors Affecting Taxpayer Non-Compliance, Accounting and Business Research 1989, vol. 20, nr 77.
  34. Tan L. M., Tower G., The Readability of Tax Laws: An Empirical Study in New Zealand, 9 Australian Tax Forum,nr 4, 1992. 
  35. The Simplification Debate: Too Simplistic? Taxation in Australia vol. 26, nr 5., 1991.
  36. Wallis D., The tax complexity crisis, 35 Australian Tax Review 2006.
  37. White M.J., Why are Taxes So Complex and Who Benefits? Tax Notes International 1990.

 

Key words: tax law, tax

Deklaracja o wersji pierwotnej:

Redakcja „Toruńskiego Rocznika Podatkowego” informuje,  że wersją pierwotną (referencyjną) czasopisma jest wydanie elektroniczne (ISSN 2080-9573).